Justice secretary Dominic Raab appeared to advise misogyny can be “a woman towards a man”, as he was challenged over the government’s technique to tackling harassment and violence towards females.

Boris Johnson has ruling out building misogyny as a hate crime – arguing it would overload the justice technique and make the struggle towards rape and domestic violence more difficult.

The primary minister claimed he desired the justice method to “enforce the current laws” relatively than introduce any new laws.

Asked regardless of whether the government taking misogyny severely plenty of, Mr Raab informed BBC Breakfast: “So I feel insults and of course misogyny is completely wrong – no matter if it’s a gentleman against a female, or a woman versus a man.”

Presenter Sally Nugent challenged Mr Raab’s remarks: “You claimed misogyny is absolutely improper no matter whether it is a gentleman versus a woman or a woman versus a person – is that what you meant to say?”

Mr Raab responded: “What I meant was, if we are conversing about things beneath the stage of general public get offences of harassment, intimidation, which are rightly criminalised – if we are conversing about, proficiently, insults with a sexist basis – I really don’t imagine that criminalising individuals types of items will deal with the problem that we have got at the coronary heart of the Sarah Everard situation.”

The justice secretary also argued that there was no issue in “trying to legislate away what is an enforcement problem”.

He additional: “Just criminalising insulting language – even if it is misogynistic – does not offer with the intimidation, the violence and the much larger amount of offence and damage and hurt that we actually should to be laser-like centered in on.”

Among the quite a few folks mocking Mr Raab online after he appeared to suggest misogyny could be directed from a gentleman, previous chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal tweeted: “If you don’t know what misogyny is then you are under no circumstances heading to locate it.”

Mr Raab also turned down criticism in excess of the Sarah Everard inquiry immediately after MPs, campaigners and authorized teams elevated concerns that it is not on a statutory footing – indicating that it will count on voluntary cooperation from the Metropolitan Police and can not compel witnesses to give evidence.

The justice secretary claimed witnesses would co-function with the inquiry into the “systematic failures” that authorized Sarah Everard’s killer to be utilized as a police officer.

Mr Raab informed Sky News that “we are not likely to have a issue finding to the reality of this” and mentioned he was self-confident law enforcement officers would co-operate with the overview into assassin Wayne Couzens’ actions.

Questioned by LBC whether or not an inquiry without having powers to compel witnesses would get to the base of the circumstance, he said: “I do not think which is circumstance – we’ve had made bought inquiries [without statutory powers] that have obtained to the real truth.”

Arguing that the public want “swift action”, the minister additional: “A statutory inquiry would be a lot a lot more extended and drawn out”.